国产精品高清免费网站-国产精品高清2021在线-国产精品福利在线播放-国产精品福利影院-色黄视频在线观看-色狐视频

學(xué)術(shù)活動(dòng)
當(dāng)前位置:首頁(yè) ? 學(xué)術(shù)活動(dòng) ?

華師經(jīng)管學(xué)術(shù)講座第366期(經(jīng)濟(jì))

2021-04-09 14:51:48 來(lái)源:院科研辦 點(diǎn)擊: 收藏本文

題目:Collectivism vs. Individualism and the Tragedy of Misbehavior

報(bào)告人:姜樹廣 (山東大學(xué)教授、博導(dǎo))

主持人:連洪泉(新葡的京集團(tuán)350vip8888經(jīng)濟(jì)與管理學(xué)院副教授)

騰訊會(huì)議:253 427 324

會(huì)議時(shí)間:4月15日下午2:00--3:30

 

摘要: We study misbehavior as a social dilemma using a repeated die-in-a-cup experiment in a group setting. The pursuit of individual interest motivates subjects to claim higher numbers. But when the total reported number of a group reaches a certain threshold, this generates an endogenous risk of collective failure. We vary the group size and collectivism vs. individualism priming in a 2×2 treatment. We observe a high level of dishonesty in all treatments which leads to the tragedy of misbehavior that 84.2% of participants’ payoff is less than the reservation payoff expected from honest behavior and subjects cannot coordinate to escape this tragedy with experience growing. Subjects in a large group claim a significantly higher number than subjects in a small group. Collectivism priming leads to lower claim in the first few periods than individualism priming but finally convergesto a high level of dishonesty in the last few periods. The effect difference between collectivism vs. individualism priming is larger in a small group than in a large group.

 

個(gè)人簡(jiǎn)介:姜樹廣,經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)博士,博士后,山東大學(xué)教授,博士生導(dǎo)師,山東大學(xué)齊魯青年學(xué)者,山東省泰山學(xué)者青年專家。研究興趣涉及非道德(如腐敗)問(wèn)題、人類合作與沖突、信念及價(jià)值觀、貧困與收入分配、效用與幸福等。已在《經(jīng)濟(jì)研究》、《管理科學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)》、China Economic Review等中外文學(xué)術(shù)期刊發(fā)表多篇論文。獲International Economic Association首屆阿馬蒂亞森獎(jiǎng)(Amartya Sen Prizes),山東省第二十九次社會(huì)科學(xué)優(yōu)秀成果獎(jiǎng)一等獎(jiǎng)、二等獎(jiǎng),浙江省哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)優(yōu)秀成果獎(jiǎng)二等獎(jiǎng)等獎(jiǎng)勵(lì)榮譽(yù)。